[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Standards for last mile performance
- Subject: Standards for last mile performance
- From: josh at kyneticwifi.com (Josh Reynolds)
- Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 03:56:26 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAC6=tfaPaYn4zoVUHwire6OmmgtxkOqC=X_K_PShEAT9kSYOzg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
In addition, the upgrade path uses the same strands simultaneously.
On May 1, 2016 3:46 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
> On 30/Apr/16 20:36, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> > For us (FTTH) we had/have enough aggressive foresight to do smaller
> > splits.. 1x16. Some are doing 1x2's or 1x4's at the corner somewhere into
> > 1x16's or 1x8's, so at the point where you start to hit decent saturation
> > you can just shrink the upstream split and fuse onto a new upstream
> strand
> > / optic. Once that gets overused, thankfully you can overlay NG-PON2.
>
> If you're being this aggressive, and then having to re-invest in the
> next PON standard, isn't the case for Active-E being made more and more?
>
> Mark.
>