[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NIST NTP servers
- Subject: NIST NTP servers
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:52:28 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAKdv5965qRG_Qe=xL+=7dcZzeaU2y8xcYXfr7EAAEFnRJ7nnyw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CACkP6k=2+18oY7HNH2cByJhyD0z=U-SX7CCo6GAR6zG3YV8mdQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Tue, 10 May 2016 16:39:54 +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer said:
> You mean the GPS network is not managed by an external entity? With
> budget issues?
>
> http://www.schriever.af.mil/GPS
Note that they *do* have motivation to keep it working, simply because
so much of their *own* gear (from gear for individual soldiers all the
way to strategic bombers and aircraft carriers) wants a working GPS signal...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20160510/207fdef5/attachment.pgp>