[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NIST NTP servers
- Subject: NIST NTP servers
- From: dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com (David Hubbard)
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 14:55:42 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CAKdv5965qRG_Qe=xL+=7dcZzeaU2y8xcYXfr7EAAEFnRJ7nnyw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAKdv5965qRG_Qe=xL+=7dcZzeaU2y8xcYXfr7EAAEFnRJ7nnyw@mail.gmail.com>
Ed, and anyone else reading this thread, I?m curious if you?ve looked at their authenticated NTP offering which uses different servers:
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/grp40/auth-ntp.cfm
We?re considering that but haven?t tried yet.
David
On 5/9/16, 11:01 PM, "NANOG on behalf of b f" <nanog-bounces at nanog.org on behalf of freetexwatson at gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello List,
>
>
>In search of stable, disparate stratum 1 NTP sources.
>
>Looking for anyone?s advice/experiences (good/bad/ugly/weird) using NIST?s
>NTP servers per: http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi
>
>We tried using ?time.nist.gov? which returns varying round-robin addresses
>(as the link says), but Cisco IOS resolved the FQDN and embedded the
>numeric address in the ?ntp server? config statement.
>
>
>
>After letting the new server config go through a few days of update cycles,
>the drift, offset and reachability stats are not anywhere as good as what
>the stats for the Navy time server are - 192.5.41.41 / tock.usno.navy.mil.
>
>
>I would greatly appreciate and feedback / advice, etc.
>
>
>Thanks!!!
>
>
>Ed