[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Public DNS64
- Subject: Public DNS64
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 03:33:10 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAPkb-7Dwn1Ekc4sA1dp5_kVmJCkXiJznqF8=PB8co9Qd8k1Fbg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAE_ug17-taszAoO+wK-5G48_a=6mBH+Wm+a=rfcU9fWgdSZo=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAE_ug16_y+Ww8B3vkh-V4RNgGJyGcT9GH65z7uYpf_-XuR_ReA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7Dwn1Ekc4sA1dp5_kVmJCkXiJznqF8=PB8co9Qd8k1Fbg@mail.gmail.com>
Ok that would be a bad idea. Nat64 is not stateless so to anycast it would
be unstable.
Sorry time to get to sleep.
Regards
Baldur
Den 30. maj 2016 03.25 skrev "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>:
> Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the
> 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service.
> Den 30. maj 2016 03.08 skrev "Tim Durack" <tdurack at gmail.com>:
>
>> For the record:
>>
>> Tim,
>>
>> I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this
>> thread:
>>
>> https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html
>>
>> but I figured I'd let you know that:
>>
>> https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64
>>
>> is now available for testing. Perhaps it will be some use.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Erik
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
>> >
>> > Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point
>> > the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
>> >
>> > Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tim:>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tim:>
>>
>