Public DNS64

[marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)]

In message <CAPkb-7Dcfwzy2amNXJS0jQKm1S36N8c5p=SpjMbeWFRt4OOphw at mail.gmail.com>
, Baldur Norddahl writes:
> Ok that would be a bad idea. Nat64 is not stateless so to anycast it would
> be unstable.

This is not anycast NAT64.  It is anycast DNS64 with the well known
64:ff9b::/96 prefix and a local NAT64 box.

While I don't like DNS64 as a solution, this service doesn't need
to be critised for faults that don't exist with it.

Mark

> Sorry time to get to sleep.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Baldur
> Den 30. maj 2016 03.25 skrev "Baldur Norddahl" <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>:
> 
> > Interesting. Now we just need someone like he.net to announce the
> > 64:ff9b::/96 prefix and run a public nat64 service.
> > Den 30. maj 2016 03.08 skrev "Tim Durack" <tdurack at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> For the record:
> >>
> >> Tim,
> >>
> >> I'm not on the NANOG lists and I don't see how I can respond to this
> >> thread:
> >>
> >>     https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2014-August/069267.html
> >>
> >> but I figured I'd let you know that:
> >>
> >>     https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/dns64
> >>
> >> is now available for testing.  Perhaps it will be some use.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> -Erik
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tim Durack <tdurack at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
> >> >
> >> > Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point
> >> > the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
> >> >
> >> > Why? Other people are better than me at running DNS resolvers :-)
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Tim:>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tim:>
> >>
> >
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org