[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MAP-E
Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
>>> -> Of course, everything has good and bad things, but with NAT444 you
>>> need to do the same,
>>
>> With static port range assignment, we don't have to.
>
> So you're going to say what ports the users are forced to use...
Like DHCP, yes. So?
>> Only users know what applications they are using.
>
> When you don't know what applications on what ports they are using.
You don't have to know, because its user's problem.
>> I'm not interested in poor IPv6.
>
> Well... if you have poor IPv6 support from your ISP, we can understand that.
You don't understand I was an active member of IPng WG trying to
prevent the WG make poor decisions. I was only partially successful.
Masataka Ohta
- References:
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- MAP-E
- From: brian at interlinx.bc.ca (Brian J. Murrell)
- MAP-E
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- MAP-E
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- MAP-E
- From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis Klētnieks)