[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

really amazon?

Subject: really amazon?
From: swimwithphish at yahoo.com (Richard Williams)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:36:08 +0000 (UTC)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

 To contact AWS SES about spam or abuse the correct email address is abuse at amazonaws.com
    On Wednesday, July 31, 2019, 9:53:59 AM EDT, Rich Kulawiec <rsk at gsp.org> wrote:  
 
 
Yes, this is egregious, but on the other hand even when the abuse
reporting mechanisms are working my experience has been that they
emit no response (other than -- maybe -- boilerplate) and take no
action, so it's not terribly surprising.

---rsk
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190731/039a096a/attachment.html>

Follow-Ups:
- really amazon?
  - From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis Klētnieks)

References:
- really amazon?
  - From: goemon at sasami.anime.net (Dan Hollis)
- really amazon?
  - From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)

Prev by Date: Estimated LTE Data Utilization in Failover Scenario
Next by Date: Estimated LTE Data Utilization in Failover Scenario
Previous by thread: really amazon?
Next by thread: really amazon?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread