[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

really amazon?

Subject: really amazon?
From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis Klētnieks)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:04:53 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:36:08 -0000, Richard Williams via NANOG said:

>  To contact AWS SES about spam or abuse the correct email address is abuse at amazonaws.com

You know that, and I know that, but why doesn't the person at AWS whose job it
is to keep the ARIN info correct and up to date know that?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190731/cd606ef7/attachment.sig>

Follow-Ups:
- really amazon?
  - From: sc at ottie.org (Scott Christopher)
- really amazon?
  - From: list at satchell.net (Stephen Satchell)

References:
- really amazon?
  - From: goemon at sasami.anime.net (Dan Hollis)
- really amazon?
  - From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- really amazon?
  - From: swimwithphish at yahoo.com (Richard Williams)

Prev by Date: email delays from Google
Next by Date: Reminder: NANOG 77 call for presentations is open
Previous by thread: really amazon?
Next by thread: really amazon?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread