[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
interesting troubleshooting
- Subject: interesting troubleshooting
- From: mpetach at netflight.com (Matthew Petach)
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 01:35:20 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAAeewD9MSPN_Nvt+UY17NMOkCDtBfz+2PCcYEw=Fg-i9vc7wkg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CALTLbCGVdut5sy+sdjFwt0+WffaWQw1FrmGkwqk77a8hpaNLbw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAeewD8Y30ZWzHA8uQUdw7JjnHvVGQpWAKdn-EM=7G-=hU=mQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEmG1=pGkpwQ50Umng3LuTzUzL-4wbtr7RS_qcFk=9MXgRZrcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAeewD9MSPN_Nvt+UY17NMOkCDtBfz+2PCcYEw=Fg-i9vc7wkg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:53 AM Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
> Hey Matthew,
>
> > There are *several* caveats to doing dynamic monitoring and remapping of
> > flows; one of the biggest challenges is that it puts extra demands on the
> > line cards tracking the flows, especially as the number of flows rises to
> > large values. I recommend reading
> >
> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/load-balancing-aggregated-ethernet-interfaces.html#id-understanding-aggregated-ethernet-load-balancing
> > before configuring it.
>
> You are confusing two features. Stateful and adaptive. I was proposing
> adaptive, which just remaps the table, which is free, it is not flow
> aware. Amount of flow results is very small bound number, amount of
> states is very large unbound number.
>
Ah, apologies--you are right, I scanned down the linked document too
quickly,
thinking it was a single set of configuration notes.
Thanks for setting me straight on that.
Matt
>
> --
> ++ytti
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200322/3875b223/attachment.html>