[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
interesting troubleshooting
Hey Tassos,
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 22:51, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
<achatz at forthnet.gr> wrote:
> Yep, the RFC gives this option.
> Does Juniper MX/ACX series support it?
> I know for sure Cisco doesn't.
I only run bidir, which Cisco do you mean? ASR9k allows you to configure it.
both Insert/Discard Flow label on transmit/recceive
code Flow label TLV code
receive Discard Flow label on receive
transmit Insert Flow label on transmit
JunOS as well:
flow-label-receive Advertise capability to pop Flow Label in
receive direction to remote PE
flow-label-receive-static Pop Flow Label from PW packets received
from remote PE
flow-label-transmit Advertise capability to push Flow Label in
transmit direction to remote PE
flow-label-transmit-static Push Flow Label on PW packets sent to remote PE
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:r14.labxtx01.us.(config-l2vpn-pwc-mpls)#do show l2vpn
xconnect interface Te0/2/0/3/7.1000 detail
..
PW: neighbor 204.42.110.29, PW ID 1290, state is up ( established )
PW class ethernet-ccc, XC ID 0xa0000025
Encapsulation MPLS, protocol LDP
Source address 204.42.110.15
PW type Ethernet, control word disabled, interworking none
PW backup disable delay 0 sec
Sequencing not set
LSP : Up
Load Balance Hashing: src-dst-ip
Flow Label flags configured (Tx=1,Rx=0), negotiated (Tx=1,Rx=0)
....
ytti at r28.labxtx01.us.bb# run show l2circuit connections interface et-0/0/54:3.0
...
Neighbor: 204.42.110.15
Interface Type St Time last up # Up trans
et-0/0/54:3.0(vc 1290) rmt Up Mar 20 04:06:45 2020 7
Remote PE: 204.42.110.15, Negotiated control-word: No
Incoming label: 585, Outgoing label: 24003
Negotiated PW status TLV: No
Local interface: et-0/0/54:3.0, Status: Up, Encapsulation: ETHERNET
Description: BD: wmccall ixia 1-1
Flow Label Transmit: No, Flow Label Receive: Yes
...
I didn't push bits, but at least I can signal unidir between ASR9k and PTX1k.
--
++ytti