[no subject]

> Stable Debian's focus is stability, not freshness. (NOTE: Debian was
> doing this long before RHEL started doing the same)

So if we demand the ultimate in stability on windows systems, should
we all run NT4?

old != stable 

Personally, I find the 2.4 series to be significantly more stable than
the 2.2 series in just about every conceivable situation. Last time I
checked, RHEL was up to 2.4.9, so I'm afraid I don't understand that
comparison.

--
Jonathan


</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00057" href="msg00057.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00049" href="msg00049.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jpheale at LearnLink.Emory.Edu (John P. Healey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00053" href="msg00053.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00055" href="msg00055.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00055.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00057.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00055.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00057.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00056"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00056"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>