[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- <!--x-content-type: text/plain -->
- <!--x-date: Mon Jan 3 15:53:59 2005 -->
- <!--x-from-r13: wvzcbc ng lnubb.pbz (Xvz Bbcbivgpu) -->
- <!--x-message-id: 1104785388.2791.4.camel@blue -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] -->
- <!--x-reference: 1104781281.2410.6.camel@blue -->
- <!--x-reference: [email protected] --> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- <!--x-subject: [ale] Distro Reply -->
- <li><em>date</em>: Mon Jan 3 15:53:59 2005</li>
- <li><em>from</em>: jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li>
- <li><em>in-reply-to</em>: <<a href="msg00056.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>references</em>: <[email protected]> <<a href="msg00049.html">[email protected]</a>> <<a href="msg00053.html">[email protected]</a>> <1104781281.2410.6.camel@blue> <<a href="msg00056.html">[email protected]</a>></li>
- <li><em>subject</em>: [ale] Distro Reply</li>
Lots of people still do. Note, The complaint was about Debian's kernel,
not a whole OS.
> old != stable
This is just as true: new != stable
> Personally, I find the 2.4 series to be significantly more stable than
> the 2.2 series in just about every conceivable situation. Last time I
> checked, RHEL was up to 2.4.9, so I'm afraid I don't understand that
> comparison.
The current Debian "Stable" stablized during the kernel 2.2 time period.
Since then only minor updates and backports have been added. RHEL
stabilized during the kernel 2.4 time period. Thus my comment about
Debian being ahead of RH in moving to a slower release cycle.
-Jim P.
</pre>
<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a name="00049" href="msg00049.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jpheale at LearnLink.Emory.Edu (John P. Healey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00053" href="msg00053.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> esoteric at 3times25.net (Geoffrey)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00055" href="msg00055.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jimpop at yahoo.com (Jim Popovitch)</li></ul></li>
<li><strong><a name="00056" href="msg00056.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
<ul><li><em>From:</em> jrickman at gmail.com (Jonathan Rickman)</li></ul></li>
</ul></li></ul>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<ul>
<li>Prev by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00056.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by Date:
<strong><a href="msg00058.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Previous by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00056.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Next by thread:
<strong><a href="msg00067.html">[ale] Distro Reply</a></strong>
</li>
<li>Index(es):
<ul>
<li><a href="maillist.html#00057"><strong>Date</strong></a></li>
<li><a href="threads.html#00057"><strong>Thread</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</body>
</html>