an effect of ignoring BCP38

[jrhett at netconsonance.com (Jo Rhett)]

On Sep 11, 2008, at 6:32 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
> FWIW, based on off-list discussion, Jo's disagreement seems to stem  
> from a misunderstanding of how loose uRPF works (he didn't know it  
> accepts any packet that has a route in the routing table).


Um, no.   Because if you put loose mode uRPF on your edges you aren't  
implementing BCP38 now are you?

I don't care how it is deployed.   That's your job ;-)

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness