Peering with abusers...good or bad?

[baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)]

So I want to buy additional ports at each IX. The slowest speed they offer.
If I am lucky they have a free 100 Mbps. And then I just announce the
prefix I want to blackhole. Doesn't matter that the port overloads. I am
just going to null route the traffic anyway...

Regards

Baldur

Den 3. mar. 2018 01.12 skrev "Job Snijders" <job at instituut.net>:

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 at 01:08, Bryan Holloway <bryan at shout.net> wrote:

>
> On 3/2/18 5:29 PM, Ca By wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:13 PM Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Dan Hollis <goemon at sasami.anime.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>> OVH does not suprise me in the least.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe this is finally what it will take to get people to de-peer them.
> >>>
> >>
> >> If I de-peer them, I pay my upstream to carry the
> >> attack traffic.
> >>
> >
> > Your isp will do rtbh
> >
> > Your peers wont
>
>
> Some public IXs support RTBH ... Equinix, DE-CIX, to name two ... PNIs
> is a different story.



Those IX â??blackholeâ?? mechanisms are a perverse ineffective method that
exists solely for marketing reasons. If you arenâ??t blackholing in the
fabric you arenâ??t blackholing.

Kind regards,

Job

>