[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Peering with abusers...good or bad?

Subject: Peering with abusers...good or bad?
From: job at instituut.net (Job Snijders)
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 00:24:58 +0000
In-reply-to: <CAPkb-7CAGczyeYnkNm4FN8F9cc78MA27uQyKhOT-8hcc80xjCg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEmG1=ow6ztw17rWxKb5A8gUjOSP5euMhcFRiZ8sAVanOCUg2w@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTUGAR-5i1bjsowJZhpirVSQEEw-GjdAw7HT3q1qk_gcw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CACWOCC_0bSMHu+n=nW0UG2mtppM71dbL0H-ysno6GdwnZZ=-Xw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7BdvLwQuN51je6O-SSDRnCUf_Y+UEgDGqJvhVA0YsrMww@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7BVk5OeCz9gXYFvx2SYOwYG8As=tovJEyUB-LQ9ZSut8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7BHJeODPqH8y5jy4QciP+2xVNO7ywXpHzZSqUsCHQkAFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7AX6_=4nMprOArtyhPoW-y41NoQT0yy4ENUuUuUvO5oCg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7CAGczyeYnkNm4FN8F9cc78MA27uQyKhOT-8hcc80xjCg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 at 01:23, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com>
wrote:

> So I want to buy additional ports at each IX. The slowest speed they offer.
> If I am lucky they have a free 100 Mbps. And then I just announce the
> prefix I want to blackhole. Doesn't matter that the port overloads. I am
> just going to null route the traffic anyway...

Sure, that works. Those are called â??choke portsâ??.

Kind regards,

Job

>

References:
- Peering with abusers...good or bad?
  - From: mpetach at netflight.com (Matthew Petach)
- Peering with abusers...good or bad?
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Ca By)
- Peering with abusers...good or bad?
  - From: bryan at shout.net (Bryan Holloway)
- Peering with abusers...good or bad?
  - From: job at instituut.net (Job Snijders)
- Peering with abusers...good or bad?
  - From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)

Prev by Date: Peering with abusers...good or bad?
Next by Date: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses
Previous by thread: Peering with abusers...good or bad?
Next by thread: Average number of ports on OLT cards
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread