[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MAP-E
- Subject: MAP-E
- From: bryan at shout.net (Bryan Holloway)
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:33:43 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAPkb-7BVB8sF8X6NzTpvOtjHNuroAB589aF2y=HSL4apHd_rBQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPkb-7A2Ye=mUkYwZuVQkyDN3hFE=rTx6Ap8pb5u_SDwe83nYQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BVB8sF8X6NzTpvOtjHNuroAB589aF2y=HSL4apHd_rBQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/2/19 5:16 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>
> Multiple customers share an IPv4 address each with an assigned port range.
>
One downside that has been brought up on the list before is that a DDoS
attack against a single subscriber will impact many, but that particular
drawback may not outweigh the benefits (costs).
- Follow-Ups:
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- References:
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- MAP-E
- From: brian at interlinx.bc.ca (Brian J. Murrell)
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)