[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MAP-E
- Subject: MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 18:02:34 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAPkb-7A2Ye=mUkYwZuVQkyDN3hFE=rTx6Ap8pb5u_SDwe83nYQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPkb-7BVB8sF8X6NzTpvOtjHNuroAB589aF2y=HSL4apHd_rBQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:33 PM Bryan Holloway <bryan at shout.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/2/19 5:16 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> >
> > Multiple customers share an IPv4 address each with an assigned port
> range.
> >
>
>
> One downside that has been brought up on the list before is that a DDoS
> attack against a single subscriber will impact many, but that particular
> drawback may not outweigh the benefits (costs).
>
>
That is true for every CGN solution. At least with MAP the DDoS will only
hit multiple users if the attackers hit random port numbers.
Regards,
Baldur
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190802/6e3ee591/attachment.html>
- References:
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
- MAP-E
- From: brian at interlinx.bc.ca (Brian J. Murrell)
- MAP-E
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)
- MAP-E
- From: bryan at shout.net (Bryan Holloway)